Kombucha Culture Brings Costa Rica’s Tropical Heritage to the West Coast

The leading kombucha brand in Central America deepens its U.S. presence, rooted in organic farming, cultural tradition, and bold flavor innovation. Visit Kombucha Culture at Natural Products Expo West Fresh Ideas Marketplace on Tuesday March 3, 2026, in Anaheim, California.

LOS ANGELES (Jan. 26, 2026) — Rooted in the traditions of Costa Rica’s tropical culture and brewed with a deep respect for land and community, USDA certified organic Kombucha Culture is bringing its vibrant pura vida (“pure life”) spirit to more shelves across the West Coast. As the #1 kombucha brand in Central America, Kombucha Culture continues to expand its U.S. presence while staying true to the heritage, sustainability, and craftsmanship that define every can. 

The idea for Kombucha Culture was born in 2014 in Southern California. Those initial dreams of creating an elevated kombucha experience flourished into something extraordinary when company co-founders David Comfort and Noel Brady moved to Costa Rica. Surrounded by lush rainforest, inspired by tropical ingredients, and guided by the "Pura Vida" lifestyle, Kombucha Culture evolved into something far bigger than a beverage. The result is a vibrant kombucha collection that captures the essence of Costa Rica’s land, “sabor,” and culture.

“Kombucha Culture started as a dream to create something meaningful and something that honored flavor, function and culture,” said David Comfort, co-founder of Kombucha Culture. “Costa Rica gave us the environment, the inspiration, and the community to turn that dream into reality.”

Kombucha Culture is still proudly brewed and packaged on the farm in Costa Rica using all certified organic ingredients, with fermentation and production carefully monitored by the team to ensure peak freshness. By infusing each brew with local fruits, roots, and plants, the company not only elevates the quality of its kombucha but also supports local farmers and helps preserve time honored agricultural practices.

Over the years, Kombucha Culture has pushed boundaries in the region, launching Central America’s first CBD-infused kombucha, the first hard kombucha in Latin America, and becoming the first USDA Organic-certified beverage produced in Costa Rica. Today, the brand is the leading kombucha in Costa Rica, found coast to coast, from the bustling streets of San José to laid-back beach towns like Malpaís on the Pacific and Puerto Limón on the Caribbean.

“Our connection to Costa Rica isn’t just where we brew, it’s also who we are; it’s like family,” said Mike Schall, U.S. General Manager. “Everything we do is rooted in respect for the land, the people, and the culture that embraced Kombucha Culture from the beginning.”

With consumer interest in fermented and functional beverages continuing to rise, Kombucha Culture offers a rare combination of category leadership, organic farming, and cultural authenticity. As the brand expands its presence in the U.S., Kombucha Culture is currently available in Southern California at premium natural and specialty retailers including Erewhon, Bristol Farms, Jimbo’s Naturally, and Lassens via UNFI, as well as select Pacific Northwest retailers such as Town & Country Markets via Crown Pacific Fine Foods.

Kombucha Culture’s lineup is Certified Organic, vegan, gluten free, and made with real, all-natural ingredients.

Boho: A bright, tropical fusion with tangy notes of fresh ginger, pineapple and hibiscus

• Island Roots: Earthy, grounding flavors of turmeric, ginger, lemon and black pepper

• Purple Rain: A bold, antioxidant-rich blend with chamomile, lavender and butterfly pea flowers

• Golden Hour: A ginger-passion fruit uplift inspired by sun-soaked evenings on the coast

• Dragon Rose: A new flavor with a smooth blend of dragon fruit and rose water

Each can delivers probiotic benefits to support digestion, antioxidant-rich ingredients to help fight inflammation, and provides a clean, natural energy along with all the fizzy refreshment of modern soda, but with fewer than 70 calories per can.

Brewed with passion, shared with purpose, and canned with character, Kombucha Culture continues to build a movement—inviting consumers to taste the culture and feel the pura vida spirit in every smooth sip.

Visit Kombucha Culture at Expo West 2026
At Expo West 2026, Kombucha Culture will bring its tropical lineup to life in the Fresh Ideas Organic Marketplace, Tuesday March 3rd, at Table #F29. Attendees can experience its signature flavors and discover how the brand bridges Costa Rica’s vitality with California’s surf-and-sport lifestyle.

About Kombucha Culture
Drink Smart. Live PURA VIDA.

Kombucha Culture is a craft kombucha brand brewed in Costa Rica and inspired by the country's pure vida lifestyle which is a celebration of health, happiness, and connection. Made with Certified Organic, vegan, and gluten-free ingredients, Kombucha Culture features zero artificial flavors, all-natural tropical ingredients, and 70 calories or less per can. Each probiotic-rich, antioxidant-packed blend is designed to refresh, energize, and restore balance naturally. Kombucha Culture is available at premium natural and specialty retailers including Erewhon, Bristol Farms, Jimbo's Naturally, Jensen’s Market, and Lassen's in Southern California, as well as select Pacific Northwest retailers such as Town & Country Markets and through leading distributors including UNFI (Moreno Valley). Learn more at kombuchaculture.com and follow on Instagram and Facebook.

For wholesale inquiries, contact puravida@kombuchaculture.com  

Media Contact: Steven Hoffman, Compass Natural, steve@compassnatural.com, tel 303.807.1042

Redefining Better-for-You Snacking: DEFI Snacks Combines Superfood Innovation & Time-Released Fuel

After a breakout year, the award-winning, woman-owned brand accelerates growth with bold new flavors and formats. Visit DEFI Snacks at Natural Products Expo West at Booth #8913.

CHATHAM, N.J. (Jan. 13, 2025) — DEFI Snacks is redefining modern snacking by combining indulgence, performance, and purpose into superfood-infused chocolate bites. Female-founded and rooted in global tradition, DEFI delivers high-protein snacks designed for fitness-minded, clean-eating consumers who refuse to choose between nourishment and indulgence. 

Each DEFI Snack recipe is built on sprouted organic buckwheat, a fiber-rich superfood. Combined with fast-absorbing whey protein crisps that offer immediate energy and slow-digesting European-grade casein protein that digests slowly to promote longer-lasting satiety, DEFI delivers time-lapsed nutrition that satisfies immediately and fuels the body over time.

Founded by Tatyana Jones, DEFI Snacks was inspired by her Ukrainian upbringing, where buckwheat is a daily staple, much like rice or potatoes in the U.S. Across Ukraine and neighboring Slovak countries, buckwheat has long been valued for its resilience, nourishment, and versatility. When Tatyana moved to the United States, she was surprised to find that buckwheat was largely unknown and widely misunderstood.

“Most people assume buckwheat is a wheat or some type of a grain,” says Tatyana. “In reality, it’s neither. Buckwheat is a naturally gluten-free flower seed, and nutritionally outperforms many of today’s trendy ingredients. It’s great for your gut, is loaded with fiber, protein, vitamins and antioxidants … and the list goes on.”

Motivated by the untapped potential of buckwheat, Tatyana partnered with a trusted scientist to explore white-space opportunities for a buckwheat-based product. After much experimentation and category analysis, she identified a clear gap in the market: snacks that are truly indulgent, yet go beyond empty calories with nutrient density and function.

Shortly after, Tatyana partnered with Chef Jean-François Bonnet, known for helping formulate many of the original Hu Chocolate flavors before the brand was sold to snacking giant Mondelez. 

A New Definition of Indulgence
DEFI stands for "Delicious Energizing Fitness Indulgence," a philosophy reflected in its lineup of high-protein, superfood-infused chocolate bites:

• Dark Chocolate Himalayan Salt Crispy Superfood Bite

• Dark Chocolate Crispy Superfood Bite

• Milk Chocolate Crispy Superfood Bite

• Milk Chocolate Peanut Butter Crunch Crispy Superfood Bite (new)

Each crunchy bite is crafted to deliver sustained, time-lapsed nutrition which satisfies immediately and fuels the body over time, keeping you satisfied for hours.

Ingredient Integrity, by Design
DEFI Snacks' formulations connect nutrient-dense recipes with modern consumer values of sustainability, women’s empowerment, and flavors with universal appeal. Each flavor starts with premium-quality chocolate, infused with better-for-you ingredients that control sugar intake and satiety, while delivering other health and functional benefits.

Key Ingredients Include:

• Real premium non-GMO chocolate, featuring 70% cacao dark chocolate sourced from the Dominican Republic and Ecuador or velvety 38% cacao milk chocolate from Peru. Both chocolates are sourced through a leading B Corp-certified chocolate producer committed to sustainable and fair practices, with full traceability of cacao beans down to the village level.

• Sprouted Organic Buckwheat, a naturally gluten-free and grain-free superfood superfood rich in protein, fiber, B vitamins, magnesium, and antioxidants. Buckwheat contains prebiotic fiber that helps slow sugar absorption and support gut health and is also one of the most sustainable ingredients that exists. True to the DEFI brand’s ethos, buckwheat enriches everything it touches. Farmers adore it because it requires low to no maintenance, yet it makes the earth it grows in incredibly fertile.

• European-grade non-GMO Whey Protein Crisps, a fast-absorbing milk protein crisp delivering immediate energy and a crunchy texture

• European-grade non-GMO pure casein protein powder, a slow-digesting milk protein that promotes longer-lasting satiety and keeps you fuller over time

Together, this combination delivers a multi-sensory texture by combining smooth chocolate with crispy crunch and sustained satisfaction that resonates strongly with Gen Z and millennial consumers. Furthermore, DEFI avoids the calorie-cutting shortcuts common in the category, choosing real ingredients and balanced nutrition without compromising taste or long-term integrity.

A Female-Led Brand That Lifts Others
DEFI Snacks is built on defiance, not just of traditional snacking norms, but of how business is done. As a female-founded company, DEFI donates 1% of its profitable sales to women-owned startups that defy the odds, reinforcing its commitment to entrepreneurship, equity, and community. As the brand grows, it hopes to lift itself by lifting others, growing its influence in the community.

The brand’s mission sits at the intersection of health, fitness, entrepreneurship, and female empowerment, creating indulgence with intention for busy professionals, clean-eating foodies, and performance-driven lifestyles.

Retail Momentum and Industry Recognition
DEFI Snacks' rapid growth in the past year has earned both buyer attention and award-winning industry acclaim, including:

• Enthuse Foundation Grand Prize Award Winner 

• Good Housekeeping Best Snack Awards Winner

• Feature on Good Morning America

• Startup CPG Shelfies Award Winner

• Food & Beverage Magazine’s Editor’s Top Pick

• RangeMe’s #3 Most Popular Snacking Brand in only 10 months

DEFI is currently available direct as well as through UNFI, following acceptance into the highly competitive UNFI Up Next Program, enabling regional and national distribution for game changer brands.

Looking Ahead: 2026 Innovation and Growth
DEFI Snacks is entering its next phase of growth with plans for new flavors, new formats, and innovative vegan options launching in 2026. Upcoming formats are designed to meet consumers across more occasions and channels, while leaning into delivering high protein and high fiber — claims both retailers and consumers are searching for.

To support national retail expansion, DEFI has also kicked off a 2026 seed raise, targeting $1.5 million to fuel distribution, innovation, and brand growth at shelf.

Visit DEFI Snacks at Natural Products Expo West, March 3-5, 2026, at Booth #8913 (ACC Level 3), Anaheim Convention Center, Anaheim, CA.

About DEFI Snacks
DEFI Snacks is a female-founded, purpose-driven snack brand redefining indulgence through protein-infused real premium chocolate bites, made with sprouted organic buckwheat, a superfood like no other! Rooted in Ukrainian tradition and built for modern lifestyles, DEFI connects satisfaction, nutrition, empowerment, and flavor — while donating 1% of profits to women-owned startups that dare to defy the odds. Products can be purchased on their website, via Amazon and at Raley’s (Northern California), Wakefern / ShopRite (East Coast), and over 150 independent retailers nationwide. Follow DEFI Snacks on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and LinkedIn.

For Wholesale Inquiries email sales@defi-snacks.com

Qualified Investor Inquiries email tatyana.jones@defi-snacks.com 

Media Contact Steven Hoffman, Compass Natural, steve@compassnatural.com, tel 303.807.1042

Industry Leaders Respond to USDA’s Funding Announcement for Regenerative Agriculture

This article first appeared in the January 2026 issue of Presence Marketing’s newsletter.

By Steven Hoffman

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, alongside U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz, M.D., on December 10 announced a $700 million Regenerative Pilot Program to help American farmers adopt practices that improve soil health, enhance water quality, and boost long-term productivity, all while building a healthier, more resilient food system, said USDA. According to the release, HHS also is investing in research on the connection between regenerative agriculture and public health, as well as developing messaging to explain this connection.

“Protecting and improving the health of our soil is critical not only for the future viability of farmland, but to the future success of American farmers. In order to continue to be the most productive and efficient growers in the world, we must protect our topsoil from unnecessary erosion and improve soil health and land stewardship. Today’s announcement encourages these priorities while supporting farmers who choose to transition to regenerative agriculture. The Regenerative Pilot Program also puts farmers first and reduces barriers to entry for conservation programs,” said Secretary Rollins.

Administered by USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), the new Regenerative Pilot Program is designed to deliver a streamlined, outcome-based conservation model—empowering producers to plan and implement whole-farm regenerative practices through a single application. In FY2026, the Regenerative Pilot Program will focus on whole-farm planning that addresses every major resource concern—soil, water, and natural vitality—under a single conservation framework. USDA said it is dedicating $400 million through the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and $300 million through the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) to fund this first year of regenerative agriculture projects. The program is said to be designed for both beginning and advanced producers, ensuring availability for all farmers ready to take the next step in regenerative agriculture.

To support the program, NRCS is establishing a Chief’s Regenerative Agriculture Advisory Council “to keep the Regenerative Pilot Program grounded in practical, producer-led solutions,” USDA said. The Council will meet quarterly, with rotating participants, to advise the Chief of NRCS, review implementation progress, and help guide data and reporting improvements. Its recommendations will shape future USDA conservation delivery and strengthen coordination between the public and private sectors.

USDA also said it is permitting public-private partnerships as part of the Regenerative Agriculture Initiative (RAI), claiming that such partnerships will allow USDA to match private funding, thus stretching taxpayer dollars further, and bringing new capacity to producers interested in adopting regenerative practices.

We asked leaders in regenerative agriculture to weigh in on USDA’s announcement. Here’s what they had to say:

Hannah Tremblay, Policy and Advocacy Manager, Farm Aid
As a strong supporter of regenerative agriculture, Farm Aid welcomes USDA’s funding announcement for regenerative agriculture, but the lack of details about the program's specifics means we're unable to give a full response or analysis. From the few details that have been provided to date, this looks like a streamlining of processes and possible restructuring of existing funding, but does not appear to represent new funding for these programs.

The chronic underfunding and oversubscription of the EQIP and CSP programs – two crucial conservation programs – are ongoing problems that this administration and Congress have not addressed. The recent budget bill passed by Congress makes it easier for large operations to disproportionately use EQIP and CSP dollars by removing payment limits and Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) requirements. Policies like these make these programs less accessible to small and diversified farming operations and do a disservice to family farmers who are trying to enact conservation practices. 

This sudden embrace of regenerative agriculture flies in the face of the other policies we've seen from this administration, including canceling the Climate Smart Commodities Program, EPA's fast tracking of pesticides and cuts to USDA's NRCS staff, who are crucial to helping farmers implement soil health practices.

Matthew Dillon, Co-CEO, Organic Trade Association
There are still many details to come in the implementation of the NRCS regenerative program, but the Organic Trade Association (OTA) is always supportive of programs that help farmers transition to improved management of their natural resources. It would appear that it will give farmers an à la carte menu of practices that they can select and create a less burdensome bundled approach with NRCS. If we can make it easier for farmers to better care for natural resources, that’s a good outcome.

The optimal outcome would be for farmers to have integrated and holistic conservation plans, like those that organic farmers do in their annual Organic System Plan. And ideally, that would include pesticide mitigation plans for those farmers who are conventional. Hopefully for some of these farmers it will be an on-ramp to exploring opportunities in organic markets.

At the end of the day, policy incentives will only go so far in rewarding farmers for ecosystem services – markets and consumers are essential. Organic is the only third party, verified, backed-by-law marketplace that does that. We will work to make sure organic farmers have adequate access and get recognition in these programs.

Ken Cook, Executive Director, Environmental Working Group
Basically, I’m pretty skeptical of the Regenerative Pilot Program. If you look at all of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s big talk during the Trump campaign and then during the transition regarding subsidies, $700 million rebranded from existing programs (with multi-billion-dollar budget baselines that a lot of us built and defended) is hardly the bold action he promised. The emphasis on efficiency and red tape is interesting—whole farm plans that originated in the 1930s and 1940s in the old Soil Conservation Service (SCS) are all about paperwork and red tape, and going back, a lot of us in the conservation world (and reformist elements within NRCS) pushed the agency to focus on practices aimed at priority lands/problems. Reformers in NRCS in the 1980s and after always felt whole-farm plans were make-work that resulted in career advancements (and documents on farmers’ shelves) but not necessarily conservation on the ground.

There was no emphasis at the press conference announcing the program on reducing pesticides. Nor was there any emphasis on aiming some of the money at organic, the only system out there that does fulfill the MAHA rhetoric from farm to grocery shelf.

And of course, during the Biden administration there was so much emphasis in regenerative circles on climate progress via carbon farming, carbon sequestration, farmers selling carbon credits, and so on, but those words and objectives have been forbidden by USDA. (We always thought the carbon stuff was way oversold—and not needed to justify lots of benefits from mixed crop-livestock farms, longer more diverse rotations, cover crops and other sensible practices that…have also been around and under-deployed by farmers since the 1930s despite BILLIONS spent by taxpayers on free technical assistance and cost-sharing).

Then of course there are the ‘antithesis-of-MAHA’ cuts to vital programs earlier this year to get local food to schools and food banks, the reductions in NRCS staff to do those whole-farm plans, and the massive, multi-billion-dollar subsidies that have been paid in tariff reparations to big commodity operations—whose payment limits have been generously increased to make sure the biggest operations get the most money.

Christopher Gergen, CEO, Regenerative Organic Alliance
The Regenerative Organic Alliance (ROA) welcomes the USDA’s announcement of a new Regenerative Pilot Program as an important signal of federal commitment to advancing healthier soils, more resilient farms, and stronger rural economies. We applaud this growing recognition that agriculture must go beyond extraction toward restoration, a core belief that has guided our work since the creation of the Regenerative Organic Certified® (ROC™) standard.

As USDA begins shaping the program’s criteria and implementation, ROA encourages alignment with the rigorous, holistic principles that define regenerative organic agriculture: improving soil health, ensuring dignified and fair conditions for farm workers, and supporting the humane treatment of animals. These three pillars are foundational to the ROC framework and have proven essential to achieving long-term ecological, economic and community benefits.

We are encouraged that the USDA acknowledges the role of organic systems in regenerative agriculture. ROC builds on USDA Organic as a necessary baseline for eliminating toxic synthetic pesticides, fertilizers, and GMOs — inputs that undermine soil biology, water quality, pollinator health, and farmworker safety. ROC then goes further by requiring additional soil health practices, pasture-based animal welfare, and fair labor conditions.

As decades of peer-reviewed research and field evidence show, regenerative practices alone cannot fully deliver intended environmental outcomes if they allow routine use of synthetic chemicals. The scientific record also shows that organic systems, including those that strategically use tillage for weed control in lieu of herbicides — consistently build soil carbon, increase water retention, reduce erosion, and improve microbial diversity. We encourage USDA to ensure that any regenerative agriculture program reflects this evidence by prioritizing systems that avoid toxic inputs and protect both ecological and human health.

The rapid expansion of regenerative claims creates both opportunity and risk. Without clear definitions, rigorous standards, and third-party verification, the regenerative category is vulnerable to greenwashing and consumer confusion. Independent analysis has shown that some non-organic regenerative labels allow herbicides, GMOs, synthetic fertilizers, and minimal verification, which could undermine public trust and the credibility of the entire regenerative movement.

With the right structure, USDA’s initiative can accelerate the transition to a food and fiber system that heals the land, strengthens rural communities, and ensures a healthier future for all; a vision that drives our mission every day. ROA looks forward to engaging with USDA as this pilot advances and to contributing our expertise, data, and proven frameworks to help shape a regenerative future rooted in integrity, transparency, and meaningful impact.

Jeff Tkach, Executive Director, Rodale Institute
Rodale Institute welcomes the USDA’s announcement of the new Regenerative Pilot Program and views it as an important signal that soil health, farm resilience, and long-term productivity are increasingly central priorities within American agriculture. This moment reflects a growing federal recognition that healthy soil is foundational to a secure food system, climate resilience, and human health.

For more than 78 years, Rodale Institute has led the science and practice of regenerative organic agriculture, long before “regenerative” entered the policy lexicon. Through the longest-running side-by-side comparison of organic and conventional farming systems in North America, Rodale Institute has demonstrated that regenerative organic agricultural practices can improve soil health, enhance water quality, increase resilience to extreme weather, and support farm profitability.

With a national network of research hubs, education initiatives and farmer training programs, Rodale Institute has helped producers across regions and production systems transition to regenerative organic practices rooted in measurable outcomes and continuous improvement. This experience, coupled with our leadership as a founding member of the Regenerative Organic Alliance, positions Rodale Institute as a critical partner in ensuring that regenerative initiatives are clearly defined, science-based, and deliver real, lasting benefits for farmers, communities, and the environment.

As the USDA advances this pilot program, Rodale Institute stands ready to contribute its decades of research, farmer-centered expertise, and leadership to help guide its success. By keeping soil health at the center of agricultural policy and practice, we can continue building a food system that supports productive farms, nourishing food, and healthy people, now and for future generations.

Paige Mitchum, Executive Director, Regen Circle
This Regenerative Agriculture Pilot Program is not new. It is a carve-out from the existing Farm Bill’s conservation funds using the same forms, rankings and field offices. The key difference is that they were processing proposals differently. Under the Climate Smart Commodities Program the process went USDA ↔ big project ↔ farmer. This pilot now routes money through individual NCRS contracts so the process flows as NRCS ↔ farmer. This sounds cleaner unless the agency in the middle just lost 20% of its staff, as is the case with the NRCS. 

By doing away with the big projects intermediaries you lose the support provided by states, tribes and NGOs whose role was to recruit farmers, do measurement verification and reporting, provide technical assistance and handle smaller payments. Without this the NRCS will need significantly more bandwidth to handle a direct to farmer approach. But they aren’t staffing up; the FY2026 plan indicated further personnel reductions, leaving me to draw only one conclusion: The regenerative pilot program will be woefully under resourced, forcing them to accept applications from large well-resourced operations leaving small and vitally important producers on their own. 

In a nine‑day window in December, the administration: backed pesticide maker Bayer in court, poured billions into the most glyphosate‑dependent crop systems, and then unveiled a sub‑billion-dollar regenerative agriculture pilot program as its health‑and‑soil solution. Once again this administration has brilliantly cut social infrastructure and meaningful programs that were supporting small farmers in regenerative transition, shielded a flagship herbicide company from liability, bailed out large monocultures, and in exchange handed us a small carve-out of existing programs with zero new infrastructure or any credible way of executing said program. As such, this reads more as a marketing scheme than it does meaningful policy work, and I hope that the private sector can step up and support the small holder farmers at the heart of the regenerative movement.

They took away the mountain we were slowly, imperfectly but intentionally building, they took a shovel and put a small mound of dirt aside and said, take this and enjoy the view.

Read Page’s full article here.

André Leu, D.Sc., BA Com., Grad Dip Ed., International Director, Regeneration International
In theory, this is a great initiative. Improving soil health through regenerative practices has been long overdue. Most farmers, including many organic farmers, need to adopt these methods. In reality, it will depend on who is selected to sit on the  Chief’s Regenerative Agriculture Advisory Council. If it is composed of regenerative and organic farmers, it will be credible. If they repeat the NOSB (National Organic Standards Board) model, it will be hijacked by academics, NGOs and agribusiness. It will be an exercise in greenwashing, promoting no-till Roundup-ready GMOs and other degenerative practices. I don't have confidence that, given the USDA's history with the organic sector, they will choose the credible option.

Alexis Baden-Mayer, Political Director, Organic Consumers Association
I've been looking into where the money's coming from for the Regenerative Agriculture Pilot Program and how much has been allocated versus taken away. This is money Congress appropriated for two regenerative agriculture programs (the Environmental Quality Incentives Program and the Conservation Stewardship Program) with a total annual budget of $4.515 billion. So, if $700 million is going to regenerative, that means $3.815 billion (84%) of EQIP and CSP funds will be going to factory farms and pesticide-drenched genetically modified field crops. Admittedly, Trump's USDA isn't the first to misappropriate these funds this way, but it is the first to celebrate it.

Earlier this year, the USDA refused to disburse $6.062 billion appropriated by Congress for family famers adopting regenerative agriculture practices and serving local markets. Now we're now supposed to be happy because the USDA is earmarking $700 million for regenerative agriculture? I feel like they're trying to convince us two pennies is more than a dollar bill because two is more than one.

Max Goldberg, Founder, Editor and Publisher of Organic Insider
The USDA's announcement of about $700 million dedicated to regenerative agriculture puts the spotlight on the importance of soil health at a critical time and is extremely welcome. Yet, whether this program can actually deliver tangible results to America's farmland remains a serious uncertainty, and there are two questions that must be answered. 

First, does the USDA have adequate on-the-ground technical staff to assist farmers in executing regenerative practices while also measuring soil health improvements? Second, will this program actually lead to a reduction in pesticide use? Only time will tell, but the level of skepticism is very high that the funds will be spent in an efficient manner and this will result in meaningful progress.

Dan Kane, Lead Scientist, MAD Agriculture
The Regenerative Agriculture Initiative (RAI), also called the Regenerative Pilot Program (RPP), is a program announced by Secretary Rollins on Dec. 10, 2025. The press release from USDA describes it as a $700 million pilot program for FY2026 focused on helping farmers transition to regenerative practices. 

The RAI is not a new program but instead a repackaging of existing USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) conservation programs, including the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP). Nor does the RAI designate new funding towards either of these programs and the practices they target. It will likely function as a priority national funding pool producers can apply to with some minor modifications to requirements and the application process. Efforts by the prior administration to increase funding to key regenerative practices and the regenerative agriculture community more broadly through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) would have provided greater funding overall in FY2026 and beyond.

The IRA added approximately $19.5 billion into USDA conservation programs above and beyond 2018 Farm Bill funding levels over a period of four fiscal years (FY2023-FY2028). EQIP would’ve been expanded by $8.45 billion over that period, with about $3.45 billion of that coming in FY 2026 for a combined total of $5.5 billion in FY2026. CSP would’ve received $3.25 billion over that period with $1.5 billion coming in FY2026 for a combined total of $2.5 billion in FY2026.

Given all the shifts in funding, and the reallocation of IRA funds to CSP and EQIP baseline spending enacted through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB), RAI is effectively funded through the reallocation of IRA funds. But, considering the reduction in total funding, it’s still not net new spending compared to what would’ve happened had IRA stayed in place. Although the OBBB increased baseline EQIP and CSP funding over a longer time period, the Congressional Budget Office still estimates that the rescission and reallocation of IRA funds will result in a net decrease of approximately $2 billion in actual conservation spending through FY2034.

While some of the changes included in this program (bundling applications, whole farm planning, soil testing) are good ideas, they’re ideas that NRCS has already applied through other programs. Major reductions in NRCS staff and proposed changes to how the NRCS is structured are likely to limit total capacity and reduce agency efficiency and function. Last, the elimination of income eligibility caps and the potential integration of public/private partnerships into the program raise concerns that this program and USDA conservation programs writ large will end up primarily serving very large farmers and agribusiness interests.

Any USDA programming focused on regenerative agriculture is a welcome addition to the financial stack for producers. No doubt we at Mad Agriculture will keep this program in mind as a potential option for the producers with whom we work. But this is a small win in comparison to the huge loss that came through the rescission/reallocation of IRA funds.

Read MAD Agriculture’s full analysis of USDA’s Regenerative Agriculture Initiative here.

Charles "Chuck" Benbrook, Ph.D., Founder, Benbrook Consulting Services
Chuck Benbrook is the former Chief Science Officer of The Organic Center; former Research Professor, Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources, Washington State University; and former Director, National Academy of Sciences Board on Agriculture

As someone who has been deeply involved in soil conservation policy, I was excited to see this announcement from the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). With $700 million committed in the next fiscal year, it's a pretty substantial investment in regenerative agriculture. The hope is that it will go on with continued, and hopefully increased, funding.

As I read the announcement for the Regenerative Pilot Program, it seems to be a clear recognition by the USDA that soil health and what is needed to enhance the biological integrity and health of the soil has to be a very high priority. In fact, on par with controlling physical erosion. And I think that's the right direction. That's how we're going to lower the cost of production. That's how we're going to clean up water and start dealing with all these rural areas with ridiculously high levels of nitrate in everybody's drinking water. It's how we're going to deal with resistant weeds. Dealing with soil biology at this point is the most important and lowest hanging fruit for healing what ails us.

I think there are two aspects to the significance of USDA's announcement. One, it recognizes farmers anywhere along the continuum, from conventional, chemical-dependent farmers to regenerative organic producers. Wherever you are along the continuum, if you want to move toward a more diversified, resilient, less chemical-dependent system, you have to make multiple changes simultaneously and timed correctly to succeed.

I also think the NRCS approach of entering into customized contracts with growers that start from where they're at and finance the next round of changes in their farming systems, which could include changes in rotations, tillage, cover crop management and water management, is a good one.

It's also a positive that it's a streamlined administrative process where the farmer basically comes in with a proposal and works with the local NRCS and farm services agency staff to come up with how much the cashier payment will be next year and presumably for subsequent years for the practices that are adopted. Of course, one of the big concerns that people have is how progress is going to be monitored and quantified in a convincing way. Also, like everyone, I'm curious to see the details of how NRCS is going to structure the contracts.

My wish with this program is that smaller producers will have as much access as larger operators, however the fact is, those big commodity farmers tend to get favored when it comes to grants. Yet, I didn't see anything in the announcement to suggest that the NRCS is going to take into account the size of the farm in allocating the available funds. But let's face it, the larger, more sophisticated, often multi-owner, farms are going to be in the door first with well thought out proposals.

Regarding the appointment of an Advisory Council to help oversee the Regenerative Pilot Program, I think (USDA) Secretary Rollins has had a constructive series of conversations with people that come out of the organic and regenerative community. I also think she'll insist that a few folks from that world are on this advisory committee. But, you know, if past is prologue, the soybean growers will have a rep, the cotton council will have a rep and the pesticide industry will have a couple of reps. And it might not be somebody that's working actively for a pesticide manufacturer today, but it could be someone who has deep roots in that community. They may be an academic now. They may work for a consulting firm, but you know, the politics inside these federal agencies is really brutal.

The NRCS regenerative program has great potential to be the fulcrum to start the transition towards more diversified, sustainable regenerative systems, but for it to work in a meaningful way at scale, it has to be combined with a similar negotiated change in how commodity program subsidies and crop insurance subsidies are currently supporting agriculture. And that's the core idea behind what we're working on now called the Farm Economic Viability and Renewal Act, or FEVER Act, to help spark discussion among agriculture community leaders and policymakers of the systemic reforms in policy needed to avoid ever-larger bailouts in the not-too-distant future.

The large sums of taxpayer money at play — over $40 billion in farm support in 2025, and likely even more in 2026 — heighten the urgency of reaching agreement on substantive policy changes. The pressing challenge is to not invest taxpayer dollars during 2026 and beyond in bigger and better band aids, but instead in support of the deeper, systemic changes in farming systems that most farmers, advocates for healthier rural communities, scientists, and policy wonks know are needed.

Companies interested in partnering with USDA NRCS in the Regenerative Pilot Program can email regenerative@usda.gov for more information. Farmers and ranchers interested in regenerative agriculture are encouraged to apply through their local NRCS Service Center by their state’s ranking dates for consideration in FY2026 funding. Applications for both EQIP and CSP can now be submitted under the new single regenerative application process.

Steven Hoffman is Managing Director of Compass Natural Marketing, a strategic communications and brand development agency serving the natural and organic products industry. Learn more at www.compassnatural.com.

Non-UPF Verified Sets a New Standard for Ultra-Processed Foods

This article first appeared in the December 2025 issue of Presence Marketing’s newsletter.

By Steven Hoffman

In mid-November, an international team of 43 scientists released a landmark series of papers in The Lancet concluding that ultra-processed foods (UPFs) now pose a “clear global threat” to public health. Drawing on more than 100 long-term studies, Reuters reported that the series links higher UPF intake to increased risk of obesity, Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, depression, and all-cause mortality.

Coverage in outlets from The Guardian and ABC News to NPR underscores the gravity of the findings. One analysis noted that UPFs are associated with harm to every major organ system in the body, and that these products are rapidly displacing fresh and minimally processed foods worldwide. University of North Carolina nutrition researcher and Lancet series coauthor Barry Popkin told NPR, “We can say now that truly ultra-processed food represents a clear global threat to our health—not only our physical health but also mental health in terms of its impacts on depression.”

At the same time, a growing body of consumer and market research points to a widening trust gap. Many shoppers want to avoid UPFs but say they can’t easily tell what qualifies. A recent New York Times Well column explored why ultra-processed products are so hard to resist and so ubiquitous in modern diets, and highlighted the way industrial formulations can override normal satiety signals and blur the line between “food” and “edible product.”

Against this backdrop, the Non-GMO Project’s new Non-UPF Verified Standard lands at a pivotal moment for CPG brands, retailers, and the entire natural and organic products ecosystem.

From GMOs to UPFs: The Non-GMO Project widens its lens
On Nov. 12, the Non-GMO Project formally announced Version 1.0 of its Non-UPF Verified Standard, described as “the nation’s first comprehensive framework” for defining and verifying foods that are not ultra-processed, and called it the “first Non-UPF Verified standard to address the ultra-processed foods crisis.”

The new certification builds on the Non-GMO Project’s 18-year record of third-party verification and its iconic butterfly seal, now found on more than 63,000 products that represent an estimated $50 billion in annual sales.

“Around the world, more people are waking up to the realization that much of what fills our grocery carts is no longer truly food,” said Megan Westgate, founder and CEO of the Non-GMO Project and Non-UPF Verified, at a recent webinar unveiling the new standard. “Doctors and researchers increasingly describe these products as ‘processed edible substances’—industrial formulations engineered for palatability and shelf life rather than nutrition.”

Westgate is careful to say this is not an attack on processing per se. As she told Food Business News: “Processing itself isn’t the enemy. It’s how and why it’s done that matters. The Non-UPF Standard defines a middle ground where convenience and nourishment can genuinely coexist.”

In practice, that “middle ground” is defined by a rigorous ingredient and processing criteria, which are detailed in the Non-UPF Verified Standard v1.0.

Why ultra-processed foods are under fire
The Lancet series and surrounding news coverage sharpen a distinction many in the natural channel have understood for decades: It’s not just what’s in food, but also how it’s made.

The Guardian’s coverage of the Lancet research noted that more than half of the average diet in the U.S. and U.K. now consists of UPFs, with some low-income and younger populations getting up to 80% of their calories from these products. Citing CDC data, ABC News reported that Americans on average consume over half of their daily calories from UPFs.

The Lancet authors point to several mechanisms by which UPFs drive harm:

• Disrupted food structure and “hyper-palatability” that encourage overeating and rapid absorption of refined starches and sugars.

• High levels of added sugar, sodium, and unhealthy fats.

• Widespread use of cosmetic additives and ultra-refined ingredients, some of which may alter gut microbiota or expose consumers to contaminants such as phthalates.

• Aggressive marketing and product design that exploit biological reward pathways, particularly in children (MAHA Commission).

In the NPR report, Lancet series coauthor Marion Nestle, professor emerita of nutrition and food studies at NYU and author of “Food Politics,” drew a direct line between the science and the need for policy and marketplace action. She noted that some countries, including Chile, have already shown that warning labels, marketing restrictions, and school food reforms can curb UPF intake. “It’s time to take on the industry,” Nestle said. “They’ve got to stop.”

The Lancet series and recent media reporting all make the point: Ultra-processed foods are not just one more dietary risk factor. They are a structural driver of global chronic disease—and the food system will not change without clear definitions, strong incentives, and credible labels.

‘Disconnected’: What consumers are telling us
In October, the Non-GMO Project released a consumer research report titled “Disconnected,” which summarized the attitudes of U.S. shoppers toward UPFs and the modern food system. Some of the topline numbers from “Disconnected” and related research are striking:

• A 2024 Non-GMO Project survey found that 85% of Americans want to avoid ultra-processed foods, but most say they feel overwhelmed and unsupported in trying to do so.

• Internal research from the Non-GMO Project’s Food Integrity Collective showed that 68% of shoppers actively try to avoid UPFs, and 70% say they need clearer labeling or third-party verification.

• New Hope Network reported that 72% of Americans say they are trying to avoid ultra-processed foods, signaling a powerful demand across mainstream and natural retail.

• “Disconnected” emphasized that consumers feel the food system is “out of their hands” — dominated by large corporations using engineered ingredients that are disconnected from natural food sources.

In other words, shoppers are ahead of policy. They are already looking for ways to opt out of UPFs, but they lack tools they can trust. That, more than anything, is the market gap the Non-UPF Verified Standard aims to fill.

The architecture of the Non-UPF Verified Standard
The Non-UPF Verified Standard approaches ultra-processing through two essential frameworks: ingredient integrity and formulation, and processing limits.

1. Ingredient integrity and formulation

The standard targets ingredients that are either emblematic of ultra-processed formulations or under scientific scrutiny for metabolic, neurological, or gut impacts. Collectively, these criteria are designed to protect what the standard calls structural integrity, nourishment, and transparency, steering innovation away from “cosmetic” ingredients and toward minimally processed building blocks: 

• Non-nutritive and bio-transformed sweeteners (such as aspartame, sucralose, stevia extracts, erythritol, and other sugar alcohols) are prohibited as sugar substitutes. Minimally processed stevia leaf preparations may be allowed only at flavor-level use, not as a core sweetener.

• Added sugars are capped by category, typically ranging from low single-digit percentages (by dry weight) for soups, sauces, snack foods, and proteins, to stricter limits for beverages and breakfast foods, and up to roughly 20% for desserts and 40% for some confectionery categories.

• Gums, thickeners, hydrocolloids, and texturizers produced via industrial degradation or fermentation—such as carrageenan, microcrystalline cellulose, polysorbates, polydextrose, xanthan gum, and maltodextrin— are largely prohibited.

• Artificial colors and certain processed oils are excluded.

• Natural flavors are confined to use cases where the corresponding “real” ingredient is present and may not be used to mask the absence of whole foods.

2. Processing limits and food structure

Not all processing is equal. The Non-UPF Verified Standard distinguishes among permissible, conditional, and prohibited methods and requires that:

• At least 70% of a product’s weight (or dry weight, for certain categories) must be minimally or moderately processed using permissible methods that preserve the food matrix.

• Up to 30% may be “conditionally processed”—for example, certain protein isolates or powders—if they meet specific criteria.

• High-impact chemical, structural, thermal, or biological modifications are not allowed, including synthetic biology and 3D-printed ingredients.

The intent is to address the very features UPF critics highlight: extensive fractionation and recombination of ingredients, aggressive “engineering” of texture and flavor, and techniques that break down food structure to the point where the body no longer recognizes the substance as food.

As the standard notes, UPF is as much about the degree and purpose of processing as about individual ingredients. The Non-UPF framework is one of the first to operationalize that insight in a way that is auditable at the product level.

The full standard is publicly posted at NonUltraProcessed.org. The Project has signaled that it will update its prohibited ingredient list annually based on emerging science and pilot feedback.

Pilot brands, early adopters and the reformulation challenge
If Non-UPF Verified is to matter, it has to show up on shelves. The early signs are promising. 

A pilot cohort of 16 brands—including both mission-driven emerging companies and established names—has been working with the Non-GMO Project and independent technical administrators to test the Non-UPF verification model across nearly every aisle. In addition, New Hope Network reported that 200 brands are already on the wait list, and that the Non-UPF Verified seal is expected to begin appearing on packages in 2026.

In Douglas Brown’s New Hope Network feature, “Non-UPF Verified: Must-Knows for Natural Brands,” Westgate characterized the program as “a movement, not just a mark,” and noted that reformulation will be essential in categories dependent on gums, stabilizers, and added sugars. “We have some cleaning up to do in this industry,” she said. “Reformulations are needed. We need less sugars and gums. It’s going to be a process. But it does seem like brands are really paying attention.”

For many natural and organic manufacturers, the reformulation challenge may feel familiar. Non-GMO and organic standards forced reevaluation of supply chains and ingredient decks; Non-UPF now pushes deeper into how those ingredients are combined and processed.

For mission-driven brands backed by retailers that cater to ingredient-savvy shoppers, the upside could be substantial:

• Differentiation in crowded categories such as ready-to-eat meals, plant-based meats, beverages, and snacks, where formulations can drift toward UPF territory even in “natural” sets.

• Alignment with policy trends, as HHS, USDA, and FDA explore definitions and potential regulatory approaches to UPFs.

• Deeper consumer trust, particularly among shoppers who already use Non-GMO Project and organic seals as navigational tools in the aisle.

For contract manufacturers and ingredient suppliers, however, this is more than a marketing play—it’s a roadmap for where formulation business is likely headed.

Industry response: Caution, criticism, and opportunity
The Non-UPF standard does not exist in a vacuum. Trade groups and conventional food manufacturers are watching closely and some are pushing back.

Food Business News noted that while states such as California have begun to legislate around certain additives and ultra-processed foods, groups like the Grain Foods Foundation argue that some UPFs can fit into healthy dietary patterns, especially when fortified or reformulated.

More broadly, many industry stakeholders have urged federal agencies to avoid definitions that hinge on processing intensity, arguing that frameworks like the NOVA classification system paint with too broad a brush and risk demonizing shelf-stable, affordable foods.

Westgate and her team acknowledge these debates. In FoodNavigator-USA’s report on the standard, she described the NOVA system as foundational but “not built to solve at the product level,” and emphasized that Non-UPF Verified is designed to be auditable, enforceable, and feasible within current food system realities.

At the same time, the Lancet series and global media coverage are shifting the terms of the debate. ABC News quoted experts who warn that global UPF proliferation is a major public health threat and that voluntary, incremental steps are unlikely to be enough.

In that context, voluntary third-party standards such as Non-UPF Verified may serve a dual role as a pre-regulatory signal to policymakers that industry is capable of responding to the science, and as a competitive differentiator for brands and retailers.

What it means for natural & organic CPG leadership
For marketers in the natural and organic products community, the Non-UPF Verified Standard is not just another badge on the front of the pack. It is a concrete response to three converging forces:

• Escalating science: The Lancet series, joined by years of epidemiology, clinical research, and meta-analyses, makes a compelling case that UPFs are a unique risk category and that their impact is global.

• Consumer anxiety and demand for coherence: Shoppers are hungry for standards that make sense of conflicting information and give them real agency.

• Regulatory and reputational risk: As HHS and USDA gather input on UPF definitions, and as advocacy groups press for action, companies that stay tethered to hyper-processed formulations may find themselves on the wrong side of both policy and public opinion.

For natural and organic brands—many of which built their identity on getting ahead of GMO, pesticide, and synthetic additive concerns—Non-UPF Verified is an invitation to lead again. That leadership could take several forms:

• Portfolio mapping: Assess where current SKUs fall on the processing spectrum, and identify quick wins for reformulation versus long-term R&D projects.

• Supplier engagement: Challenge ingredient partners to develop minimally processed alternatives to emulsifiers, texturizers, and refined oils that violate the Non-UPF criteria.

• Retailer collaboration: Work with retailers to pilot Non-UPF assortments, shelf tags, and consumer education in key categories.

• Storytelling and transparency: Use packaging, digital channels, PR, and in-store activations to explain how Non-UPF Verified complements existing organic, non-GMO, regenerative and other claims.

A call to action
The publication of the Non-UPF Verified Standard is not the final word on ultra-processed foods; however, it is the opening of a new chapter. Science will continue to evolve. Policymakers will debate definitions and regulatory levers. Industry groups will push back, negotiate, and in some cases innovate.

But the direction is clear. When The Lancet, The New York Times, The Guardian, NPR, ABC News, and the natural products trade press all make the same point—that ultra-processed foods are undermining global health and consumer trust—the question for our industry is not whether to respond, but how quickly.

For brands that built their business on “better for you,” Non-UPF Verified offers a unique opportunity to help redefine what “better” means at the level of processing itself, and to align product portfolios with a future in which real food—and the integrity of how it’s made—once again takes center stage.

For more information on the standard, please refer to the full Non-UPF Verified Standard v1.0, the Non-GMO Project’s launch announcement, and the Disconnected research report, available via the Non-UPF team’s Google Drive link.

Steven Hoffman is Managing Director of Compass Natural Marketing, a strategic communications and brand development agency serving the natural and organic products industry. Learn more at www.compassnatural.com.

Paul Stamets Speaks at UN on the Power of Mushroom Mycelium

OLYMPIA, Wash. (Nov. 12, 2025) — Internationally renowned mycologist Paul Stamets recently addressed a distinguished audience at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City as part of a global gathering highlighting transformative leaders advancing human and planetary health.*

Stamets' talk explored the powerful immune-supporting properties of Turkey Tail and Agarikon—two mushroom species with extensive research demonstrating their ability to bolster immune function. Drawing on decades of study and discovery, Stamets emphasized how the mycelium of these mushrooms holds profound potential for supporting both personal wellness and the health of our planet.*

"Speaking at the United Nations was truly an honor," Stamets said. "The immense potential of Agarikon and Turkey Tail mushroom mycelium to support immune function cannot be understated. The opportunity to share such remarkable findings in front of a global audience is a true testament to fungi's inextricable role as stalwart allies in the health of both people and planet."*

For 50 years, Stamets has devoted much of his work as a mycologist to researching and advocating for the essential function that fungi have as cultivators of life on this planet. As Founder, Member, and Owner of Fungi Perfecti, LLC, Makers of Host Defense® Mushrooms™, Stamets directs his company to reinvest $1 million annually into mycological research and discovery.*

Stamets' efforts include organizing clinical trials on the efficacy of mushroom mycelium to support human health and contributing to numerous peer-reviewed scientific journal articles in the field of mycology. As owner of Fungi Perfecti and Host Defense, he and his team have cultivated the world's largest Agarikon culture library in a pursuit to preserve the at-risk species.*

"No other company in the mushroom supplement space has contributed more to the field of mycology or fungi for ecological preservation than Fungi Perfecti," Stamets said. "I've ensured that our work has always been in service to science, sustainability, and discovery—this moment at the United Nations stands as a milestone of this lifelong mission."

About Fungi Perfecti, LLC—Makers of Host Defense® Mushrooms™
Fungi Perfecti, LLC is a family-owned company founded by internationally renowned mycologist Paul Stamets, who launched Host Defense Mushrooms under Fungi Perfecti with the goal of building a bridge between people and fungi. Host Defense is now a leading mushroom supplement brand in the U.S., specializing in mushroom mycelium-based supplements designed to support human health. Its product line reflects the company's commitment to sustainability, scientific integrity, research, and education.*

Fungi Perfecti has become synonymous with cutting-edge mycological research and solutions—from water filtration (mycofiltration) and ecological rehabilitation (mycoremediation) to combating Colony Collapse Disorder in bees. A Certified B Corporation, Fungi Perfecti is third-party designated as Climate Positive, offsetting 110% of its carbon emissions, and is a certified Leading Living Wage Employer. Follow Host Defense and Fungi Perfecti on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. 

Media Contact
Steven Hoffman, Compass Natural, steve@compassnatural.com, tel 303.807.1042

Can Trump’s Support Move the Needle on CBD?

Could President Donald Trump's recent endorsement of hemp-derived CBD products provide new momentum for an industry that has struggled in recent years under a patchwork of inconsistent state and federal regulations?

This article first appeared in the November 2025 issue of Presence Marketing’s newsletter.

By Steven Hoffman

In what industry observers have called a surprise move, on Sept. 28, President Donald Trump posted a video on his Truth Social platform promoting the health benefits of cannabinoids, suggesting that covering hemp-derived CBD under Medicare would be a “game changer” and “the most important senior health initiative of the century.” At a time when some members of Congress are pushing for policy changes that could upend the CBD market, Trump’s implied endorsement of CBD is remarkable.

Trump’s post supporting Medicare coverage for CBD products sparked a 36% rise in publicly traded cannabis stocks in the weeks that followed, Yahoo Finance reported. The post also raised hopes that the White House might take a more permissive approach to marijuana regulation following Trump’s statement in August that his administration was exploring a potential reclassification of marijuana — an effort originally proposed under the Biden administration. Removing cannabis from its Schedule I status would mean the federal government acknowledges the plant’s medicinal value.

“I’ve heard great things having to do with medical, and I’ve [heard] bad things having to do with just about everything else,” Trump said during an Aug. 11 White House press conference. “But medical and for pain and various things, I’ve heard some pretty good things.”

The video Trump shared was produced by The Commonwealth Project, an organization dedicated to improving health and longevity for older Americans. It was founded by Howard Kessler, a billionaire and philanthropist with ties to the CBD industry and a longtime friend of Trump’s. According to Independent Voter News, Kessler believes “that medical cannabis could be harnessed to not only provide older Americans with an alternative to traditional prescription painkillers but to reduce soaring health care costs saddling millions of seniors.”

In the video promoted on Truth Social, CBD was described as a way to "revolutionize senior healthcare" by helping reduce disease progression. The narration claimed CBD could help “restore” the body’s endocannabinoid system and ease pain, improve sleep and reduce stress in older adults. It also cited a Fox News segment referencing a Price Waterhouse Coopers report that estimated potential cost savings of “$64 billion a year if cannabis is fully integrated into the healthcare system.”

A Boston- and Palm Beach, Florida-based entrepreneur and philanthropist, Kessler founded Kessler Financial Services, which helped pioneer affinity credit cards. He later obtained one of Massachusetts’ first medical marijuana licenses in 2014, and became the state’s first recreational seller before his company was acquired by a Georgia cannabis firm in 2019. In June 2024, Kessler appeared on Fox News to discuss his efforts to integrate medical cannabis into traditional health care for seniors.

Regulatory Confusion Hinders CBD Market
Regulations around the commercial use of hemp and CBD were significantly eased across the U.S. when industrial hemp was legalized under the 2018 Farm Bill during Trump's first term. However, since its passage, a growing number of state-level battles and lawsuits have emerged regarding the definition of hemp, the “intoxicating hemp” loophole around hemp-derived Delta-8 THC, and the lack of consistent federal and state regulatory frameworks for the cultivation, manufacture, marketing and sale of hemp-derived cannabinoids such as CBD, according to national law firm Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney.

Trump’s implied endorsement of CBD comes as a bipartisan group of lawmakers pushes back against attempts to ban hemp-derived THC products, arguing that such action would “deal a fatal blow” to the hemp industry and violate congressional rules. In a letter sent to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) on Sept. 26, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) and 26 other members warned that appropriations legislation containing hemp ban provisions would devastate the industry that emerged after hemp’s 2018 legalization.

A group of eight Democratic senators also sent a letter in September urging leadership to pursue regulation rather than prohibition, warning that banning products containing any amount of THC would trigger major upheaval in the hemp market. (Under the 2018 Farm Bill, hemp is legally defined as containing no more than 0.3% THC on a dry weight basis.) Meanwhile, dozens of hemp farmers from Kentucky have urged Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to back away from efforts to re-criminalize certain hemp-derived products, Louisville Public Media reported.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul also warned that the cannabis policy movement has “swung hard on the prohibitionist side.” In June, he introduced the Hemp Economic Mobilization Plan (HEMP) Act to counter potential restrictions, proposing to triple the amount of THC allowed in hemp while addressing several other regulatory challenges facing the industry.

For its part, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reaffirmed in January 2020 that it is unlawful to introduce food containing added CBD into interstate commerce, or to market CBD as, or in, dietary supplements. Now, according to Marijuana Moment, while Trump was endorsing CBD on Truth Social, the FDA quietly updated its adverse drug event reporting forms to track incidents related to hemp-derived cannabinoids, including CBD — part of an effort to gather more data on potential health effects associated with such products.

Hemp Industry Responds to President’s Support
In an Oct. 7 letter to President Trump, Jonathan Miller, legal counsel for the U.S. Hemp Roundtable, praised the president’s acknowledgment of hemp’s potential and urged him to oppose the proposed hemp ban:

"The recent video you shared about the extraordinary value of hemp products was important, raising awareness on the positive impact our American-grown and manufactured products have. Here at the U.S. Hemp Roundtable, our members are focused on giving Americans choices in improving their overall health and wellness ... but now we need your help! Congress is close to passing a hemp ban, reversing the work you led in 2018 to make hemp blossom. A proposed definition change to hemp, being touted as protecting Americans, would wipe out 95% of this uniquely American industry that you are so proud of,” Miller stated.

He continued: “A more effective way to protect American consumers and jobs would be to support and demand robust hemp regulation — age restrictions along with uniform testing, labeling, and packaging requirements. Outright prohibition is not the answer, nor would it make anyone safer. Banning legal hemp products that are already regulated at the state level will not protect consumers; it would only shift hemp to the black market and destroy a rising American industry in the process. ... A ban would put American farmers, American businesses, American consumers, our veterans, seniors, and more than 328,000 American workers at risk."

Miller added that "American voters are on your side on this issue. In Texas, a state with a rapidly growing hemp market, 76% of your voters and 78% of seniors favor legal, regulated hemp sales. In fact, more than 62% of Texans say they are more likely to support candidates who back the regulated sale of hemp-derived products."

Bottom line: Trump’s apparent support for CBD could mark a turning point for a sector long constrained by legal uncertainty. Whether the endorsement leads to meaningful policy change remains to be seen — but it has already reignited momentum, investment, and public discourse around hemp-derived wellness products in America’s fast-evolving natural health market.

Steven Hoffman is Managing Director of Compass Natural Marketing, a strategic communications and brand development agency serving the natural and organic products industry. Learn more at www.compassnatural.com.

Roaring Fork Mill Unveils New Packaging for Regenerative Organic Certified® Flours

Colorado’s only Regenerative Organic Certified® mill inspires home bakers to elevate their holiday recipes with flavorful, heirloom grain flours.

CARBONDALE, Colo. (Oct. 28, 2025) — Roaring Fork Mill, Colorado’s only Regenerative Organic Certified® (ROC) stone mill, is rolling out a fresh new look for its line of heirloom grain flours — just in time for the holiday baking season. The family-owned Colorado mill is inviting home cooks to bake with purpose and flavor this holiday season.

Roaring Fork Mill’s flours are milled from 100% Colorado-grown, non-GMO grains cultivated by local farmers using regenerative organic practices that enrich the soil and protect biodiversity. Each flour, from White Sonora to Turkey Red and Purple Barley, tells a story of place and flavor, yielding breads, pies, pastries, and pastas that truly taste alive.

“Our heirloom flours have a depth of flavor that simply doesn’t exist in conventional flour,” said Jacob Trumbull, founder and head miller of Roaring Fork Mill. “Because these grains are grown in living soil and stone-milled fresh, they retain their natural oils and aromas, bringing a remarkable richness and texture to every bake. You can taste the difference.”

Chefs across Colorado agree. Chef Gabby Gawreluk of Tiny Pine Bistro uses Roaring Fork Mill flours in her celebrated kitchen.

“These flours are unlike anything else — they bring soul to a dish,” said Gawreluk. “When we bake with Roaring Fork Mill’s grains, the flavors are layered, earthy, and expressive. It’s Colorado terroir at its best.”

For holiday bakers, Roaring Fork Mill’s online shop makes it easier than ever to bring regenerative ingredients to the table. Whether it’s a rustic loaf, a flaky pie crust, or festive cookies, the mill’s freshly packaged flours make it simple to impress your family and guests with more flavorful, nourishing recipes.

For recipe inspiration, from dinner rolls to chocolate chip cookies, visit roaringforkmill.com. Roaring Fork Mill’s full line of Regenerative Organic Certified® flours is available for purchase online and through select retailers throughout Colorado.

About Roaring Fork Mill
Founded in 2022, Roaring Fork Mill is a family owned Regenerative Organic Certified® stone flour mill based in Carbondale, Colorado. Sourcing heirloom grains from local farmers using regenerative practices, the mill produces premium flours for home bakers, chefs, and food producers. Products are available online and for wholesale. Visit the website and follow Roaring Fork Mill on Instagram, LinkedIn, and Facebook. 

Media Contact
Steven Hoffman, Compass Natural, steve@compassnatural.com, tel: 303.807.1042

JAMBAR Accelerates Nationwide Growth Through Strategic Retail and Distribution Expansion

JAMBAR, Created by PowerBar® Co-Founder Jennifer Maxwell, Grows Mission-Driven Brand’s Presence in Jewel-Osco, Shaw’s, and Natural Retailers Nationwide

SAN RAFAEL, Calif. (Oct. 22, 2025) - JAMBAR, the artisan-crafted organic energy bar company founded by Jennifer Maxwell, creator of the original PowerBar, is significantly expanding its retail footprint across the United States. Celebrating its fifth year in business, the company announced that its bars will be available in more than 200 new store locations this month. In addition, JAMBAR announced the growth of its distribution network.

The artisanal organic energy bars created by JAMBAR, which donates 50% of after-tax profits to active living and music education nonprofits, will now be available in major markets from the Midwest to New England and across the Mid-Atlantic.

New retail partners now stocking JAMBAR in their protein and energy bar sets include:

• Jewel-Osco: 82 supermarket locations throughout the greater Chicago area, and

• Shaw’s: 90 supermarkets across New England.

JAMBAR is also strengthening its presence in the specialty and natural products channel with new retail partners:

• MOM’s Organic Market: Serving the Mid-Atlantic region with 27 stores focused on organic and climate-friendly foods, and

• Buehler’s Fresh Foods: 15 employee-owned locations across Ohio.

“We’re thrilled to see JAMBAR reaching more communities across the country,” said Jennifer Maxwell, founder and CEO of JAMBAR. “From the California coast to New England, our mission has always been to make clean, convenient, organic nutrition accessible to people who care about what they eat, how they move, and how they give back. Each new retail partnership helps us share that mission and continue fueling active, vibrant lives.”

JAMBAR delivers great-tasting, nutrient-rich energy bars made with certified organic, whole-food ingredients. The bars are crafted with no seed oils or processed sugars and contain 10g of protein, serving as an easy-to-digest fuel source for athletes and active individuals. JAMBAR offers five distinct flavors, including gluten-free and plant-based options.

Distribution Expansion
The brand’s growth also extends to its wholesale distribution network. JAMBAR is now available through new key partners, including Palko (Indiana), Quality Foods Distributing (Montana and the Northern Rockies), and KeHE Distribution Centers in Aurora, Colorado, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This broadens JAMBAR’s reach to independent and natural retailers nationwide.

About JAMBAR
In 2021, Jennifer Maxwell founded JAMBAR with the goal of helping people feel good about the ingredients they put in their bodies, and the positive impact they can have on their local communities. JAMBAR organic energy bars are made in the U.S. and crafted in small batches in the company's state-of-the-art manufacturing facility in California. A woman-owned, mission-based business, JAMBAR donates 50% of after-tax profits to organizations that support active living and music. JAMBARs are available in sports specialty shops, natural foods and grocery stores, and online at Amazon.com. Learn more at www.jambar.com and follow JAMBAR on Facebook and Instagram.

For wholesale inquiries, contact sales@jambar.com 

Media Contact
Steven Hoffman, Compass Natural, steve@compassnatural.com, tel: 303.807.1042

Fungi Perfecti LLC Earns Leading Living Wage Employer Certification

Host Defense® parent company ensures all employees receive a living wage

OLYMPIA, Wash. (Oct. 10, 2025) — Fungi Perfecti, LLC, makers of Host Defense® Mushrooms™, is proud to announce its official certification as a Leading Living Wage Employer by Living Wage For US. This prestigious designation affirms that every member of the company’s staff earns at or above the full family living wage for their location.

Last year, Fungi Perfecti partnered with Living Wage For US to undergo a comprehensive evaluation of its total compensation package—including base pay, company-sponsored medical benefits, 401(k) retirement plans and matching contributions, discretionary bonuses, and commission structures. The analysis confirmed that Fungi Perfecti’s compensation model meets and exceeds the living wage thresholds across all its positions.

“Paying a living wage is about dignity, equity, and integrity,” said Shanna Brown, VP of People at Fungi Perfecti. “We’re proud of this commitment.”

This recognition aligns with Fungi Perfecti’s longstanding ethos of supporting people, planet, and community through responsible business practices. In addition to offsetting 110% of its carbon footprint, operating as a Certified B Corporation, and reinvesting over $1 million annually into scientific research, Fungi Perfecti ensures its success is shared with the people who make it possible.

What Is a Living Wage?
According to the Global Living Wage Coalition, a living wage is qualified as “the remuneration received for a standard workweek by a worker in a particular place sufficient to afford a decent standard of living for the worker and their family.” This standard, which Living Wage For US adheres to in its certification process, requires a living wage to afford earners the means to meet the essential needs of themselves and their families.

By this criterion, Leading Living Wage Employers must provide compensation that ensures their employees have the ability to obtain adequate food, water, housing, health care, transportation, education, and clothing—among other essentials—while also providing a cushion for unexpected expenses. Unlike the legal minimum wage, which often falls short of real-world living costs, the living wage is independently calculated each year to reflect the actual cost of living required for a given community. Current rates are published at www.livingwageforus.org.

About Fungi Perfecti, LLC—Makers of Host Defense® Mushrooms™
Fungi Perfecti, LLC is a family-owned company founded by internationally renowned mycologist Paul Stamets, who launched Host Defense® under Fungi Perfecti with the goal of building a bridge between people and fungi. Host Defense is now the leading mushroom supplement brand in the U.S., specializing in mushroom mycelium-based supplements designed to support human health. Its product line reflects the company’s commitment to sustainability, scientific integrity, research, and education.*

Fungi Perfecti has become synonymous with cutting-edge mycological research and solutions—from water filtration (mycofiltration) and ecological rehabilitation (mycoremediation) to combating Colony Collapse Disorder in bees. A Certified B Corporation, Fungi Perfecti is third-party designated as Climate Positive, offsetting 110% of its carbon emissions. Follow Host Defense and Fungi Perfecti on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. 

Media Contact
Steven Hoffman, Compass Natural, steve@compassnatural.com, tel 303.807.1042

From Startups to Multinationals, Regenerative Agriculture Reshapes the Food Business

This article first appeared in the October 2025 issue of Presence Marketing’s newsletter.

By Steven Hoffman

As climate change accelerates, the food industry faces a paradox: It is both a driver of ecological degradation and a potential solution. Agriculture accounts for about a quarter of global greenhouse gas emissions, yet it also has the capacity to sequester carbon and rebuild ecosystems. At the center of this opportunity sits regenerative agriculture  – a set of practices that go beyond “sustainable” to actively rebuild soil, restore biodiversity, and promote community health and the health of local economies.

In business terms, regenerative agriculture is moving from philosophy to label. Much as “organic” transformed consumer expectations in the 1990s and early 2000s, “regenerative” is quickly becoming one of the fastest-growing claims appearing on food and beverage products. Retailers, too, are beginning to carve out shelf space for regenerative brands, echoing the early days of organic.

The rise of regenerative can be attributed in great part to the fact that, according to GLOW/NielsenIQ surveys, 70% of consumers consider environmental responsibility more important than they did just two years ago, and 90% see eco-friendliness as a key decision criteria. Over 78% of consumers aged 18-24 believe the current food system is not sustainable and is a major cause of the climate crisis, reported Errol Schweizer on Sept. 22, 2025, in Forbes.

For companies across the value chain – from Roaring Fork Mill, a family-run mill working to restore heirloom grain farming in the Rocky Mountain West, to Lundberg Family Farms, which recently converted all of its organic rice production to Regenerative Organic Certified, and to multinationals including McDonald’s, PepsiCo, General Mills, Nestlé, and others – adopting regenerative practices represents not just climate responsibility, but it also gives them a competitive edge in a changing marketplace.

What Regenerative Agriculture Means
The concept of regeneration is not new. Farmers and Indigenous communities have practiced soil-restoring methods — such as cover cropping, crop rotation, and integrated livestock management — for centuries. What distinguishes modern regenerative agriculture, as coined by Robert Rodale in the late 1970s, is its intentional framing as a climate strategy, ecosystem rebuilder, and market driver.

At its core, regenerative agriculture refers to farming and grazing practices that restore soil health, increase biodiversity, improve water cycles, and strengthen the resilience of agricultural regions. These practices, which vary according to crop, climate, and ecosystem, are helping to rebuild soils, sequester carbon, and revitalize farming communities. While not all regenerative standards are based on organic principles, many proponents argue that organic remains a baseline for regenerative practices.

The Regenerative Organic Certified (ROC) standard, launched by the Regenerative Organic Alliance (ROA) in 2017, represents the most rigorous framework for these practices worldwide. Unlike other regenerative programs, ROC prohibits the use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, which the organization asserts contribute to the climate crisis. ROC certification includes requirements for practices that respect animal welfare and promote social fairness.

The results are becoming measurable. According to industry data released by ROA in September 2025, ROC practices now span nearly 20 million acres across 46 countries, involving more than 67,000 smallholder farms and 320 participating brands.

From Niche to Mainstream: Market Momentum
Consumer demand is pushing regenerative agriculture into the mainstream. Products carrying the ROC label have grown 45% year-to-date, with retail sales up $20 million, representing a 24% jump over the previous year, according to ROA. Such growth is remarkable given that regenerative certification is relatively new, and it demonstrates  that consumer appetite for climate-friendly products extends beyond niche markets, according to the organization.

Several pioneering brands working with the Regenerative Organic Alliance illustrate how regenerative claims are translating into market share:

- Dr. Bronner’s, the natural soap leader, has worked with more than 18,000 smallholder farmers to convert 52,000 acres to ROC standards.
- Lundberg Family Farms, known for its California-grown rice, has transitioned all of the organic rice it grows to ROC. The company reports that 65% of its consumers actively seek ROC products, creating clear market differentiation.
- Applegate, a leader in organic meats, converted 100% of the beef in its organic hot dogs to ROC in 2025, touching nearly 10 million acres, the company claims. Label research found that adding the regenerative claim increased purchase consideration significantly among hot dog buyers, a signal to CPG marketers that the regenerative label stands out in crowded categories.
- Gallant International, a private-label textiles company, has grown its farmer network from 700 to 1,250 in just three years to meet demand for ROC cotton.
- Patagonia continues to invest in regenerative supply chains through its clothing and also via its food division, Patagonia Provisions, and also through its membership in coalitions such as One Planet Business for Biodiversity.

“Regenerative organic farming practices can draw down carbon instead of releasing it, enhance ecosystem biodiversity instead of degrading it, and increase nutrient density instead of depleting it,” said Lundberg Family Farms CEO Craig Stevenson. “People say it can’t be done at scale, but we’re bringing ROC rice to every category of our portfolio, showing that when farmers commit to regeneration, the result is healthier food, stronger ecosystems, and real progress in the fight against climate change.”

The Multinational Pivot
While smaller players often lead the way, the sheer scale of agriculture requires buy-in from multinational corporations. In recent years, some of the world’s largest food companies have made highly publicized commitments to regenerative agriculture:

- General Mills pledged to advance regenerative practices across one million acres by 2030. Five years in, progress reports show that farmers are seeing improved soil health and reduced input costs, though scaling challenges remain.
- PepsiCo launched regenerative potato farming initiatives in Latin America, tying regenerative practices to the sustainability of its Lay’s and Sabritas brands. The company is also part of the Step Up for Agriculture Initiative, a collaboration with major retailers and other food and beverage companies to scale regenerative agriculture through locally tailored support systems.
- McDonald’s announced a $200 million investment in regenerative practices in 2025, targeting beef, potato, and dairy supply chains.
- Nestlé has embedded regenerative agriculture into its cocoa sourcing strategy, linking it to deforestation reduction goals.
- Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) in September 2025 released its third annual report, which announced that in 2024 the company engaged more than 5 million acres in advancing regenerative agriculture practices.
- Mondelez International announced in May 2025 a “new wave of impact-first investments,” including an investment in eAgronom, an ag-tech company supporting the transition to regenerative agriculture to improve soil health, reduce carbon emissions, and “enhance financial resilience through sustainable practices.”

Collectively, these companies signal that regenerative agriculture is no longer a fringe concept but an integral part of corporate climate strategy. By joining efforts such as the Step Up for Agriculture Initiative and One Planet Business for Biodiversity, they also acknowledge that collaborative approaches are needed to scale regenerative systems globally.

Certifications and Standards: Who Defines “Regenerative?”
As regenerative agriculture has gained traction, the number of new product entries with regenerative claims on the label has surged across categories. Yet, as the USDA has not regulated any standard for regenerative agriculture, questions of definition, standards, and credibility remain, leading to the emergence of a number of regenerative certification seals, creating both momentum and some confusion.

Amazon-owned Whole Foods Market allows four regenerative agriculture certifications to appear on front-of-package claims in its stores: Regenerative Organic Certified (ROC), Certified Regenified, Certified Regenerative by A Greener World, and Ecological Outcome Verified by Land to Market (see below). The retailer does not recognize organic as the only baseline standard for regenerative practices, which is one reason it accepts more certifications than just ROC, the Observer reported.

For business leaders, however, the takeaway is clear: certification matters. Manufacturers may complain about the need for a parade of seals across the front panel of a food package, yet it comes down to the fact that consumers (and investors) increasingly demand third-party verification to avoid “greenwashing” and to ensure label claims such as “fair trade” or “gluten free” are true. The same applies to regenerative agriculture claims made on a product label.

According to Ken Roseboro, reporting in February 2025 in The Organic & Non-GMO Report, demand for regenerative certification has been overwhelming. Today, several certification programs provide frameworks for brands and farmers:

- Regenerative Organic Certified (ROC): Overseen by the Regenerative Organic Alliance, the ROC seal is widely considered the gold standard because it integrates soil health, organic farming practices, animal welfare, and social fairness. According to a SPINS report published in August 2025, ROC products saw a 22% year-over-year increase in buyers, making it one of the fastest growing certifications in the country.
- Regenified certifies producers, brands, and supply partners committed to the adoption of regenerative agriculture, offering a seal to place on the label of certified products to signal to consumers that the product comes from a farm that is putting regenerative principles into action.
- Land to Market, created by the Savory Institute, works to connect brands with raw materials that come from verified regenerative land bases. The program verifies regenerative outcomes using ecological monitoring rather than prescriptive practices. Founded by Allan Savory, the program focuses primarily on livestock.
- A Greener World has established a set of standards for its Certified Regenerative program, which the organization says offers supply chain assurance for brands, processors, distributors, and others who want to assure customers of transparency.
- Soil & Climate Initiative, developed by Green America, offers a whole-systems, farm-to-shelf regenerative agriculture program with options for third-party verification.
- Rainforest Alliance in September 2025 announced the launch of a new regenerative agriculture standard, certification program, and seal for coffee, expected to appear on consumer coffee bags in 2026.

Investor Interest in Regenerative Food Systems
Behind the consumer-facing story lies another trend: a surge of capital into regenerative food and agriculture. Impact investors, venture capitalists, and blended-finance funds are betting on regeneration as both a climate solution and a growth opportunity. For investors, regenerative agriculture represents an unusual convergence, offering  measurable environmental impact alongside competitive financial returns, especially as consumer demand continues to climb.

As an investment category, regenerative food and agriculture systems raised $1.17 billion in funding in the first quarter of 2025, according to data released in April 2025 by the Regenerative Food Systems Investment (RFSI) group. RFSI, which hosts the annual Regenerative Food Systems Investment Forum, reports that almost half (46%) of all deals in Q1 2025 came from venture capital investment.

Recent investment highlights in regenerative food and agriculture include:

- Mad Capital, the investment arm created by leading consultancy Mad Agriculture dedicated to scaling regenerative agriculture systems, announced in September 2025 that it had closed a $78 million oversubscribed Perennial Fund II to finance regenerative organic food and agriculture.
- DiversiFund, launched in 2025 by an affiliate of Transformational Investing in Food Systems, introduced a new pooled-financing model for regenerative food systems, aiming for $100 million in capital commitments in 2026.
- TransCap Initiative, with financial support from the Walton Family Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, along with 20 leading investors, funders and farming organizations, announced in June 2025 that they were joining forces to design innovative financial infrastructure to align capital flows to accelerate regenerative agricultural production in the U.S. Midwest.
- Mirova, a French impact investment firm that manages more than $34 billion in assets, is financing a portfolio of 12 regenerative agriculture projects across Latin America, Africa, and Asia, focusing on crops such as cacao, citrus, coffee, nuts, and botanical ingredients. One project currently underway in Morocco is converting conventional citrus orchards to regenerative organic practices. The World Economic Forum in September 2025 called on the global food industry to “embrace regenerative agriculture now.”
- Zintinus, a German investment firm managing $175 million, projects that regenerative agriculture will be a key part of a $4.5 trillion business opportunity in 2030 associated with 10 “critical transitions,” including organic foods, diversifying protein, reducing food waste, restoring ecosystems and promoting resilient rural economies.

What’s Next?
Despite momentum, regenerative agriculture still faces critical challenges, such as scaling. Can regenerative methods be deployed across millions of acres quickly enough to make a dent in climate change? Can carbon sequestration from such farming practices be quantified? With multiple certification programs, how will the industry ensure consistent, credible standards and metrics? For farmers, transitioning to regenerative practices often requires upfront costs and new knowledge. Without financial support and assistance, many farmers will struggle to make the leap.

For consumers, while “organic” is now widely understood, “regenerative” is still emerging in the lexicon. Brands must invest in storytelling and education to connect the regenerative label to tangible benefits.

To address this, ROA announced in September 2025 that it has partnered with food tech company Edacious on a four-year study to test the nutritional makeup of Regenerative Organic Certified foods and to drive further awareness of the health benefits of ROC products. ROA and Edacious will analyze more than 200 food products bearing the ROC seal. “With Edacious and the Regenerative Organic Alliance, this data becomes more than numbers: it becomes a story about how regenerative organic systems deliver measurable nutritional benefits,” Eric Smith, CEO of Edacious, told AgFunderNews.

For producers, practices such as no-till farming, cover cropping and rotational grazing are presented as effective solutions to restore soil organic carbon and improve soil health, ultimately increasing farm profitability and resilience against climate change. But how do you measure that? Researchers from the Soil Health Institute, University of Vermont Agricultural Research Service, the Regenerative Viticulture Foundation, Agoro and elsewhere are currently addressing that question by developing tools and methods to measure and quantify carbon sequestration in regenerative soils – key data for farmers, agriculturalists, climate change experts, policymakers and others.

The rise of the regenerative label reflects more than a marketing trend — it signals a strategic pivot for an industry under pressure from climate change, shifting consumer values, and investor scrutiny. For small brands, regeneration offers differentiation and authenticity. For multinationals, it represents risk management and brand relevance. For investors, it provides a rare dual return: financial performance and measurable climate impact. Much as the organic label reshaped food markets over the last 30 years, regenerative is poised to redefine them in the decades ahead. The question is no longer whether regenerative agriculture can scale, but how quickly — and who will lead the transition.

Momentum is building. As Christopher Gergen, CEO of the Regenerative Organic Alliance, noted, “Nearly 20 million acres are already under regenerative organic management, and with accelerating adoption rates and growing consumer demand creating clear market incentives, the movement is shifting from an emerging practice to a mainstream business and climate strategy.”

Steven Hoffman is Managing Director of Compass Natural Marketing, a strategic communications and brand development agency serving the natural and organic products industry. Learn more at www.compassnatural.com.